Disclaimer

Overstating what security technology can do gets people hurt. A business that reads "monitored" as "safe" takes risks it would not otherwise take, which is worse than knowing it is exposed. So this page states the limits plainly rather than in small print.

Our platforms judge behaviour against known attack patterns and against a baseline learned from your own environment: a script writing where it has never written, a host scanning its neighbours, a port that was closed yesterday, an item leaving a counter while nobody is watching. That catches a large share of real incidents, and it cannot catch every one.

A quiet week means nothing matching our checks was found. It is not proof that nothing is present. An alert means something matched a pattern worth attention — it is not proof of wrongdoing, and legitimate but unusual activity does trigger alerts, which is why tuning against your environment is part of every engagement.

No security product anywhere is 100% accurate, and any vendor claiming to be is the thing you should distrust.

Monitoring reduces dwell time — the gap between something going wrong and someone knowing. That gap is usually what decides the size of the loss, which is why it is worth paying for. It is not a substitute for patching, segmentation, access control, backups or staff awareness, and where those are the real problem we will tell you that instead of selling you more monitoring.

Video detection accuracy depends on camera placement, lighting, angle and obstruction. Part of setup is telling you which cameras cannot reliably support which detection, rather than quietly under-delivering on them.

Emergency escalation puts the right number, the location detail and the clip in front of the person you nominate. It does not place the call for you: a confirmed emergency should be verified by a human first, because an automated false alarm costs you credibility with the services you will need next time. We do not offer facial identification of members of the public.

Entry and exit times derived from footage are for operational use. They are not presented as a tamper-proof biometric record.

The guides are written for the common case and were accurate when published. Platforms redesign their flows constantly, so a screen described here may have moved. Follow the official page we link to as the authority, and if the two disagree, believe the platform.

We help you identify the correct official recovery or appeal route and prepare a submission that answers what the platform actually asks. The decision is the platform's alone, it can go against you, and there is no appeal we can escalate on your behalf. Some accounts are not recoverable, and when that looks likely we will tell you rather than sell you hope.

Nothing on this site is legal, financial, tax or insurance advice, and reading it does not create a professional relationship. If money has been taken, report it at cybercrime.gov.in or on 1930 and tell your bank — that is the priority, and our advice does not replace it.

Links to platforms, banks and government portals are provided because they are the correct destination. We do not control that content and are not responsible for it. Company and platform names appear only to identify the service in question; no endorsement, affiliation or partnership is implied in either direction.

Acting on information here is your decision. Take a backup before changing security settings, understand that enabling two-factor authentication without saving recovery codes can lock you out, and do not make an irreversible change to an account you cannot afford to lose without checking first.